






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h76A3QHv5Cw&feature=related
When the traffic stop and First Responders videos (we took this still photo from the alleged traffic stop) were presented it into the public as genuine, we knew they were faked. Look at PHOTOS #1, #2, #3 & #4. In the photo below, see how low the cement divider is on the left hand side. Look how the off ramp road is forking to the right and away from Interstate 40. See how the minivan goes completely past the low cement divider on the left hand side and drives all the way around the curve! Pathetic. Make special note of the series of tall skinny towers on the horizon, on the far right side. You will be seeing a lot of these, closer up, on the following reenactments.







that fella, the one who lost his son, he made a comment that if anyone wants to find him, he’s 7 miles west of BFE arkansas, he’s not hard to find but they might like it. seems to me that this fella likes the notion of someone coming after him.
who’s crazier, the guys who shot his son or the father who challenges those to try? the second amendment was designed to protect US, the normal guy from the government.
Here is the APB/BOLO description broadcast on May 20th, 2010...
************************************************************************
(West Memphis, AR 5/20/2010) Two West Memphis police officers have been shot at I-40 and Airport Road in West Memphis, AR.
We
have confirmed Brandon Paudert, son of West Memphis Police Chief Bob
Paudert, was killed.
Police
are looking for two
hispanic males
in a white
Dodge Caravan
white with an orange
roof and
*Ohio* plates. [My emphasis: Two (2) different 911 operators asked the Sole eyewitness if the killers van had Ohio tags, he said "no."]
A
third suspect is being sought.
The
van was last seen headed east on I-40.
Both
the I-40 and I-55 eastbound bridges are closed at this time due to
the shooting.
************************************************************************
***The Kanes were white in a white Plymouth Voyager white with a white roof and Ohio plates.
*Immediately after the events of May 20, 2010, a close associate of the Kanes was asked by Arkansas law enforcement if the Kanes were Hispanic. The answer was "no". The real killer suspects were Hispanic. There were reports of Hispanics running away from the scene of the shooting.
Point 1. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane were never at the alleged traffic stop therefore not responsible for the unfortunate deaths of two officers at a prior alleged traffic stop. Point 2. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane were not Sovereign citizens.
Point 3. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane were not anti-government.
Point 4. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane were not racist. Point 5. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane did not have a vendetta against anyone.
Point 6. Jerry Kane and Joe Kane were Tortured and wrongfully killed!! (The head law enforcement officer had every opportunity to bring the Kanes in alive, yet refused.)
Point 7. The SPLC aka Southern Poverty Law Center Zionists and ADL aka Anti-Defamation League Zionists and other media complicit in the cover up.
Point 8. FLAT OUT LIES AND COMPLETE CONTRADICTIONS
PUBLIC NOTICE: THIS WILL SERVE AS AN IMMEDIATE CEASE & DESIST TO ROBERT (BOB) PAUDERT, THE SPLC, ADL, AND ALL NEWS AND/OR MEDIA OUTLETS WHO CONTINUED TO PRINT LIES DESPITE ALL ATTEMPTS OF THE WIDOW TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT AND WHO CONTINUED TO DEFAME AN INNOCENT FATHER, MINOR SON AND THE WIDOW WHO KNEW THE TRUTH WOULD COME OUT. YOU ARE BANNED FROM PRINTING, SHOWING PHOTOS OR VIDEO, IMPLYING OR STATING ANYTHING DEROGATORY RE: JERRY KANE, JOE KANE, ANY FAMILY MEMBER OR DONNA LEE WRAY-KANE. IF YOU DO, YOU ADMIT, AGREE AND STIPULATE TO PAYING 100 BILLION DOLLARS EQUIVALENT IN SILVER COIN. I DON'T WANT THE MONEY. I JUST WANT IT TO BE SO OUT OF ANY FINANCIAL REACH THAT IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO PRINT ANYTHING DEROGATORY. CONSIDER YOURSELF NOTICED. IF YOU DO SO, YOU DO SO AT YOUR OWN PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL PERIL. MORE BELOW.
5/2/2011
The above listed facts will become very clear in a few short moments.
************************************************************************************************************************
POINT 1. JERRY KANE AND JOE KANE WERE NEVER AT THE ALLEGED TRAFFIC STOP THEREFORE WERE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UNFORTUNATE DEATHS OF TWO OFFICERS.
Yes, we agree and confirm that a video was downloaded to youtube.com of a Seminar just 6 days earlier. The way the tv report was worded, led people to believe that it was a Seminar Jerry Kane had just done 6 days earlier. But the video that was downloaded to youtube.com 6 days prior was from an All Day Seminar that Jerry Kane had done in Fontana, CA almost 10 months prior, on August 2, 2009! On that date of August 2, 2009, Jerry Kane was getting large. He started losing weight shortly after that August 2, 2009 Fontana, CA Seminar. Jerry Kane had lost at least 60 lbs. since that time. This is why we see a concocted phony dash cam portraying Jerry Kane as morbidly obese!
The Coroner confirms this, with the ASP Criminal Laboratory official autopsy report stating that Jerry Kane had a slightly obese abdomen. It is impossible for the morbidly obese man in the dash cam to have been Jerry Kane. The dash cam was faked in order to falsely and maliciously place the Kanes at a traffic stop they were never at. In effort to attempt to justify Jerry and Joe Kane being rammed, tortured and killed with no calls for surrender, in a hail of over 150 bullets.
This was a very badly put together video after the fact. It was not a big production with a lot of money behind it with skilled people doctoring it, (quite the contrary) due to how ludicrous it was, once it was taken apart. Only a few knew.
************************************************************************************************************************
16 year Joe Kane was not at the alleged traffic stop. The dash cam released 41 days later, shows clear evidence of heavy duty doctoring. Joe Kane had a military haircut, brown hair, definitively defined brown eyebrows. The boy portrayed as Joe Kane in the produced dash cam has blondish hair halfway down his forehead, no detectable eyebrows, 2 left hands and one right hand. In the 7 minute 22 second video from the dash cam, the boys face is only seen for 1 1/2 seconds and the face is in motion the entire time. This is the video the media played over and over and over again, ad nauseatum, to cement in your mind that 16 year old Joe Kane was the perpetrator. But let's take it apart and slow it way down....
Chief: Then I understand THEY went around shootin at Brandon as he was running around the car. THEY got in a shootout and shot and killed Brandon. And then as THEY'RE leaving THEY go back and shoot Bill again...
On May 20th, 2010 in West Memphis, Arkansas, Sergeant Brandon Paudert and Officer Bill Evans were patrolling I-40, watching for signs of drugs on the move through their jurisdiction. When Evans spied a white minivan with unusual Ohio license plates, [my emphasis] he pulled the van over at the exit near Mile Marker 275, and called his partner for backup. Safety came first, and in the dangerous world of drug trafficking, there is no such thing as a routine stop.
Click here for Jerry Kane's ORIGINAL Certificate of Registration
As you can see, the License plates were Ohio plates EDE 8396. In the ASP-Case Summary it references the same plates, EDE 8396.
POINT 3. JERRY AND JOE KANE WERE NOT ANTI-GOVERNMENT.
Jerry and Joe wanted REAL government, not corrupt government. Right after their Homicides occurred, a close associate was interviewed and asked if Jerry and Joe were Anti-government. The answer was "no." When asked why the question was asked, it was said that Jerry had Anti-government material in the minivan. When asked what the Anti-government material was and who was the author of it, it was told that a CD entitled 'Banks don't loan money', was found in the minivan. Are Banks government? How is having a CD entitled 'Banks don't loan money', Anti-government?
Then the close associate was asked if Donna Lee Wray-Kane was Anti-government. The associate said "No, why?" The FBI said "She has a gun." The associate said "She also has a concealed weapons permit and has a right to have a gun. (Again, hardly the actions of One who has been alleged to not believe in any Laws to have a concealed weapons permit) The associate asked the FBI "Do you guys have guns?"
Jerry Kane had for years been giving Seminars as to the Fraud on the people at the hands of the Banks, which was not a scheme or any other such nonsense. Jerry Kane conducted Seminars on what the Banks were doing long before the media ever caught wind of the Banks Fraud and began reporting on it finally. The media has now come out in full force in exposing the same Fraud, Robosigners, phony Assignments, Allonges, Pooling and Servicing trusts and certificates, exactly what Jerry Kane spoke on in his Seminars. Jerry and Joe Kane were not anti-government at all.
In reviewing an FBI report on Jerry Kane, in serial 283, of OC 266-O, dated 09/08/1999, an EC indicates that Jerry Kane is possibly connected to a group known as Washitaw Nation. The FBI report states "This group is Anti-government in its thinking." However, The United Nations recognizes this group as legitimate indigenous people. So what is the problem? Why do we have FBI agents saying people are Anti-government if they utilize their God given right to protect themselves which is backed up by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the united states of America? It would seem that the Agency calling those who choose to utilize their Rights as Anti-government, are in fact the very ones who are Anti-people or Anti-Rights.
GOVERNMENTS SOLE PURPOSE IS TO MAINTAIN AND PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS!!
Hale v. Henkel. 201 U.S. 43:”...we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an INDIVIDUAL and a CORPORATION, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitles to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest and seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state. ...”
If someone doesn't feel their Rights are protected by the very public servants who are sworn to do so, that means that their Rights are NOT being protected and maintained. Instead of the public servants getting back in their box, doing their job and stop labeling and profiling those who abide by the Constitution, public servants are bashing and labeling the people who are dissatisfied with their job performance. This is just as ridiculous as bashing and labeling children who say they are Anti-Pedophile. Would people object if Firemen all of a sudden started breaking down their front doors of their homes or pulling people over in their vehicles to see if they had flammable materials? Firemen are GREAT! They do a wonderful job and they don't need to set fires, profile people or restrict people's Rights, in order to justify the incredibly stellar job they do.
Jerry and Joe Kane wanted real government back. The cover up of the real killers of the downed officers made to appear as if the Kanes had something to do with it, is EXACTLY the point Jerry Kane illustrated, as in wanting real government back. Jerry and Joe Kane were Anti-Corrupt government!
POINT 4. JERRY AND JOE KANE WERE NOT RACIST.
Jerry and Joe were colorblind. And I'm not saying that they couldn't see reds or greens, etc. They loved everyone, no matter what color, nationality or religion they were. Color meant nothing to them.
However, Chief Paudert has been the subject of three (3) Public Press Conferences by the West Memphis City Counsel and the NAACP, in effort to get him fired or resign as Police Chief of West Memphis Police Department of Arkansas. Why? For his Hypocrisy, Racism and Brutal Policing Practices. The last Public Press Conference calling for the Chief to resign was on May 6, 2010. Exactly 14 days before he allowed an innocent family to be Tortured and wrongfully murdered!
**************************************************************************************************************
POINT 5. JERRY AND JOE KANE DID NOT HAVE ANGER TOWARD ANYONE.
Jerry and Joe were peaceful people. Jerry was quoting an old Testament bible verse on one of his Seminars, yet this portrayed by the media, SPLC and ADL as it being a direct quote from him. Even worse, they edited off Jerry's own sentence he said right after the quote. What part did they edit off? The edited off the part where Jerry said "But we don't want violence, that is not what we are after." This was done in effort to make Jerry appear dangerous, sell more papers, SPLC and ADL sick attempt to grovel for more donations by fearmongering and falsely scaring people against other fellow Americans. The SPLC and ADL continued to demonize and lie about the Kanes, who both would give the shirt off their backs, help people for no money who had no money, simply in order to help their fellow man.
One of 16 year old Joe Kanes last actions was to force his dog Olie to jump out of the van in attempt to get to safety. You can see Joe's blue shirt in the center drivers side window, getting shot while forcing Olie to jump out and save himself. Olies mom, Little Missy, was most likely killed when the wildlife officer rammed the Kanes van. It appears that after Joe was shot trying to make Olie jump out, as he was moving back to the front of the minivan to check on his dad when you can see a shotgun load coming in under the leaves of a tree, likely hitting the boy in the back. We have reports that Olie was shot 8 times after being forced to jump out of the minivan. And Olie ran to the automatic doors at Walmart, the automatic doors opened for Olie and he ran into the food section and was terrified and bleeding. The reports were that the last survivor, Olie, was going to make it, everything was fine, expected to pull through. Then Olie all of a sudden died. Without good explanation. More later.
POINT 6. JERRY AND JOE WERE TORTURED AND WRONGFULLY MURDERED
**Keep the following in the forefront of your minds as you read this: According to the ASP PIO Public
Press Conference on May 20, 2010, after the Kanes were killed, the Kanes
were found to have 1 long rifle and one revolver. The two police
officers were killed with AK-47's, as in plural....The 'cornered suspects ' didn't match the eyewitness accounts of the killers or APB/BOLO descriptions put out. The Kanes didn't match the race of the killers (Hispanics), the number of killers (3), the complections of the killers (Dark) and the Kanes vehicle didn't even match the vehicle description of the killers (White van with an Orange roof).
In the May 25, 2010 wmc-tv article entitled West Memphis Police Chief recalls losing son in deadly traffic stop, it states, The Pauderts went home, but Bob had his police radio. He heard officers had cornered the suspects in the Walmart parking lot. Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010 http://www.wmctv.com/story/12543145/west-memphis-police-chief-recalls-losing-son-in-deadly-traffic-stop?clienttype=printable&redirected=true
Chief Paudert knew the suspects were still alive because dead people can't be 'cornered', and he had the opportunity to fulfill the duties and obligations of his job and Oath of Office as the head law enforcement officer and bring them in, however, Chief Paudert said "I grabbed my pistol and I was going to Walmart and I had planned on killing them," Paudert said. "I wanted to kill them." Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010 http://www.wmctv.com/story/12543145/west-memphis-police-chief-recalls-losing-son-in-deadly-traffic-stop?clienttype=printable&redirected=true. He didn't say he was going to go down to the Walmart and try to make the suspects turn themselves in. He said he planned on killing them, in his own words! Was this the verbal ok to other officers to kill the Kanes and deprive them of due process? To make sure that there were not to be any calls for surrender? Or did he give the shoot to kill order?
A threat to kill "suspects" from a public servant who took an Oath to protect and defend the Constitution without regard for due process is an impeachable offense in a due process community. Who is the domestic terrorist here? Did Chief Paudert give the order to kill or imply for the Kanes to be killed when he said this in the May 25, 2010 wmc-tv story?
Chief Paudert outright premeditated 2 murders while he clearly
could have given due process to Jerry Kane and Joe Kane as they were
still alive and cornered. Also, the Kanes HAD to be alive because the
Chief grabbed his pistol to go to Walmart to kill them. One of his
yet to be named SWAT officers came to his house later, after the
shooting and told him about shooting Jerry Kane. "I had it aimed
at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me and I blew his
brains out," Paudert said. "I hugged him and kissed him and
said he did exactly what I would have wanted him to do."
Source: Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
http://www.wmctv.com/story/12543145/west-memphis-police-chief-recalls-losing-son-in-deadly-traffic-stop?clienttype=printable&redirected=true.
It sure looked that way to me after 150+ bullets are
launched toward the Kanes van. No sense in letting petty things like
facts or silly due process of real Law (not Color of Law) get in the
way. Later, after Jerry and Joe Kane had been murdered because he
didn't make the call on his radio which obviously worked because he
heard the suspects were cornered at the Walmart on it, he heard the
suspects, Jerry and Joe Kane, had been killed. What a surprise! A
SWAT officer went up to the Chief and recounted how he had killed
Jerry Kane. According to an article published by The Commercial
Appeal, an unnamed SWAT officer said regarding his weapon "I
had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked at me
and I blew his brains out," Who is the domestic
terrorist here? He didn't say "I had it aimed at the
suspect when he turned around and looked at me I called for him to
surrender, he refused and I blew his brains out," He
didn't say "I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned
around and looked at me I called for him to surrender, he refused and
aimed a gun toward me putting me in fear of my life and I blew his
brains out," SWAT MAN SAID
"I had it aimed at the suspect when he turned around and looked
at me and I blew his brains out,” According to an
article published by wmc-tv, Chief Paudert said "I
hugged him and kissed him and said he did exactly what I would have
wanted him to do." Source:
Janice Broach, wmc-tv, Memphis, TN May 25, 2010
http://www.wmctv.com/story/12543145/west-memphis-police-chief-recalls-losing-son-in-deadly-traffic-stop?clienttype=printable&redirected=true.
This is criminal beyond description and belief. These are clearly the
types of remarks of individuals who have no business in law
enforcement and feel they are above the law. Vigilante justice and
lynch mobs should not be tolerated by anyone working under the auspices of a law enforcement agency
for which they represent and are employed. Who are the Domestic
terrorists here?....Again, no call for surrender ever came. We
demand the evidence that a call for surrender was issued or that
officers were identified prior to the alleged gun battle that the
Kanes allegedly participated in at Walmart. The only
circumstances in which Jerry Kane or Joe Kane EVER would raise a gun
to anyone is if they'd been shot at first. Jerry and Joe had never
shot anybody, EVER. Jerry said he had been shot years ago by a Sheriff in Ohio who literally did a drive by on him. The scar was awful. Joe had been shot in the face with a BB gun when he was 10 years old by a 13 year old boy. Jerry was arrested because the boy said he didn't shoot Joe in the face or anywhere else, and that Jerry was lying. But in Joe's autopsy report, the ASP Criminal Laboratory Coroner removed a BB from little Joe's beautiful face. Jerry and Joe had been harassed time and time again, beaten by tin god rogue police and Sheriff, who now claims after Jerry Kane is dead and can't speak for himself, that Jerry was dangerous. Even though Jerry and Joe had both been shot, they STILL didn't shoot the people who shot them, or anyone else! Who are the domestic terrorists here? Vigilante 'justice' is illegal and unlawful
precisely because of horrific unimaginable injustices such as these.
As he speaks to the rapt group of Tennessee officers, Paudert projects graphic photos of the two dead assailants onto a giant screen. Source: As printed in The Commercial Appeal article dated April 17, 2011by Kristina Goetz, Cindy Wolff http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/apr/17/west-memphis-police-chief-sovereign-citizens/
Chief Paudert conducts 'Conferences' going around the country telling other Chiefs and officers that the Kanes were Sovereign citizens. He refers to them as "scum" or "vomit.” No description seems too vile. Source: printed in The Commercial Appeal article dated April 17, 2011 by Kristina Goetz, Cindy Wolff http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/apr/17/west-memphis-police-chief-sovereign-citizens/ Chief Paudert warns officers and parading graphic dead photos of an innocent man, an innocent child, calling them '”scum” and “vomit?” No description seems too vile? Who is the Domestic Terrorist here? A frail attempt to be on the offense because the cover up and flat out Homicides of the Kanes, has become shockingly, brutally clear.
The widow and stepmother and part owner of Olie and Little Missy has been bashed, attacked and threatened with being shot by one of the very people who has concealed and withheld clear proof that her family was innocent all along and orchestrated a cover up. Donna Lee Wray-Kane was forced to file a lawsuit in Federal court as evidence kept coming up missing, important pieces of evidence kept being forfeited through parties with no standing, etc. Police Chief Robert (Bob) Pauderts response to the Federal lawsuit? Source: By Cindy Wolff, The Commercial Appeal April 21, 2011 response? http://m.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/apr/21/west-memphis-police-sued-by-kanes-widow/
By Cindy Wolff, The Commercial Appeal April 21, 2011
**************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************
www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com
******************************************************
THE
SPLC AKA SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER AND THE ADL AKA
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUND COMPLICIT IN THE JERRY AND JOE KANE
DEMONIZATION AND HOMICIDE COVER
UP.
******************************************************
After the May 20, 2010 Jerry and Joe Kane Homicide incident, Mark Potok from the SPLC said "Jerry Kane was not in their 'database' but he had the ‘characteristics’ of a Sovereign citizen”. A longtime avid SPLC member and Contributor called Mark Potok and said "I knew Jerry Kane really well, he and Joseph were really good friends of mine and they were nothing like you are describing, why are you profiling them like this?" Mark Potok said "Oh well, it's already on the record." (So, basically, the lies were already put out there by Mark Potok, and he would look like a fool if he retracted his lies, so he left them out there). Let's not forget the Census worker that got Mark Potok completely discredited because he screamed that the Census worker 'was killed by right wing extremists' then it turned out the Census worker had killed himself. He was going to commit suicide anyway but his family wouldn't get the insurance money if it appeared like he committed suicide, so the Census worker committed suicide but made it appear as if he had been killed.
And SPLC’s Mark Potok continued his lies…
Print This Post
Mark
Potok, let's take your Hate filled 'Hatewatch' Letter courtesy of
your hate group called the SPLC apart, piece by piece, shall we? You
will see that we did not edit YOUR words out, thereby not stooping to
your pathetic level as you did to the words of Jerry Kanes widow on
June 3rd,
2010. Let's expose for all the world to see in a 'meandering' point
for point expose,
your
insane rantings, lies, defamations and demonization of innocent
people...Those who read this will clearly understand that nothing the
SPLC says about any American, or anybody else for that matter, can
possibly
be construed as truth…
Many people, seeing their immediate family members killed after allegedly murdering two police officers, might retreat into pained silence. Some might even find a way to express their condolences to the officers’ loved ones.
Really? Many people would do that? When their immediate family members have been killed by The West Memphis, Arkansas Police Department? The very same West Memphis Police Department which is known as the most racist and brutal police force in America? The very same West Memphis Police Department that has the largest recorded percentage of hate crimes committed BY the police, in a city of its tiny 28,000 population size? This same city where the West Memphis City Council and NAACP had THREE (3) Public Press Conferences to force the racist brutal Police Chief Robert (Bob) Paudert to resign on THREE (3) different occasions for hypocrisy, racism and brutal policing? The last Public Press Conference occurring on May 6, 2010, just 14 days before the Kanes were, in fact, brutally murdered by them? The same West Memphis Police Department that brought us the WEST MEMPHIS THREE, (WM3), that just got a new hearing due to the fact a Judge just ruled that West Memphis Police Department concealed and withheld evidence?? The same West Memphis Police Department that is well known for their cover ups?? Show me any other city where the NAACP joined the City Council 3 times in a joint effort to get rid of a racist, brutal bigot Chief of Police, namely one Robert (Bob) Paudert, off their police force! I thought the SPLC was against RACISM and now the SPLC is right in bed with the RACISTS? After seeing their immediate family members killed by police in a hail of over 150+ bullets after 'allegedly' murdering two police officers? Do you know what the word 'allegedly' means, Mark Potok? We are sure that some might retreat into pained silence. But what business was it of yours what people do? Some might even find a way to express their condolences to the officers' loved ones? Again, really? After not knowing what led up to it? After seeing the immediate family members exterminated with a vengeance with 150+ bullets launched at them and kept in an information blackout as to WHY the immediate family members were tortured and killed in a hail of over 150+ bullets launched at her immediate family members and vehicle? Would they really Mark? Would you? You would retreat and not find out what happened? You would apologize? What would you apologize for, if you didn't even know what happened? Most people would not 'roll over' when a horrible unspeakable act and injustice has been carried out. Most people care about their loved ones more that that. All I can say is.....Thank God we are not related
Not Donna Lee Wray. That's right, not her. She is not a quitter. Despite your best efforts.
On the contrary, the 50-year-old Floridian who describes herself as the common-law wife of Jerry Kane She describes herself as the common-law wife of Jerry Kane? In the present tense? Um, Jerry Kane was dead. Do you know what a Widow is? Did you write this hate article before or after Jerry Kane was killed? Do you know the difference between past tense and present tense?
has spent much of the time since Kane and his son Joseph apparently gunned down two West Memphis, Ark., officers on May 20 Apparently gunned down? First 'allegedly', now 'apparently'? Are you kidding me Sir? Are you saying you didn't know if it was true or not?
issuing angry threats, Yes, there was a threat to call the police due to reporters nonstop harassment. After the widow did in fact call the police, it was no longer a threat, it was a reality, Sir. And if you would have bothered to report accurately, it was more like hysterical sobbing pleas to be left alone in her grief, hardly 'issuing angry threats'.
hurling epithets at reporters, No, not just reporters. You are also perceived to be a 'nasty vulture' for having the audacity to back that ilk. Plans for the dead and burial arrangements are nobody's business, including yours. Are you claiming that it is not utterly ghoulish to hound people by incessantly pounding on their doors and ringing their phones off regarding the disposal plans regarding what little the West Memphis Police Department left of their deceased family? To the family, the bodies or remains were not bodies or remains, they were FAMILY to her. Hounded to the point that the widow was forced to call police? Are you claiming that to be the opposite of nasty and not vulture-like?
accusing police of a cover-up, and Oh, do you mean the cover up we just exposed and blew wide open for all the world to see? Do I comprehend you correctly? Are you claiming there WASN'T a cover up, before the lone dash cam with no audio, or the investigation was even completed, Mark Potok? How would you know if it was, or not? Did you? Or didn't you? Are you claiming that the police NEVER LIE? That their word is unimpeachable? What business is it of yours who accuses who of what?
trying to charge millions of dollars for use of her “copyrighted” name. Not trying. Doing. Get it straight. If you are claiming that your own name does not belong to you, Mark Potok, who does your name belong to? Who owns your name Mark Potok? Surely you can tell us, right? If we don't own our own names, enlighten us please, as to who does?
The Kanes were killed by police The Kanes were killed by police? Yes, we know. We saw their execution on TV. We saw the Kanes exterminated.
In a gunfight some 90 minutes Show us the uncut video Mark Potok. Show us the Kanes in a gunfight. Because after taking that video apart, frame by frame, there were no outgoing bullets coming out of that van. Only incoming. This was a shootIN, not a shootOUT.
after the double murder, "The"double murder? What are you saying Mark Potok? Are you saying the Kanes did in fact kill the two officers at a traffic stop that we have just proven the Kanes were never at? That sure sounds like slander of good name, Libel, and a host of other very serious charges, including Defamation of Character.
but apparently 'apparently'??? Again, 'apparently'? Do you actually KNOW anything Mark Potok?
managed to badly wound two more officers Was it the Kanes that managed to badly wound two more officers Mark Potok? Would you swear a Sworn under Penalty of Perjury Oath to that, Mark Potok?
before being shot themselves. Really? They were shot? Thanks for the newsflash. We wouldn't have known, otherwise, if not for your stellar 'reporting skills' and snappy 'up to the minute' updates.
Last week, after I was quoted Quoted? You mean last week you called the newspapers and tv stations and got yourself 'trotted out' by anti-American, anti-right, anti-gun Interviewers? Is there a reason you are so completely against the Constitution and peoples' Rights, Mark Potok? Why are you so anti-American, anti-people and anti-rights?
in
some press accounts describing Jerry Kane as an enthusiast of the
tax- and law-defying
That's
right. YOUR press accounts. First you said Jerry Kane was not in your
silly 'Hate-a-base,' then 2 weeks later you portray yourself as the
big expert on Jerry Kane. Where did you get your information from?
Your information stunk. You completely ignored the SPLC member who
told you factual first hand knowledge that your information was dead
wrong about Jerry and Joe Kane!
You
didn't correct the record because as you said "It was already on
the record," a record that YOU created yourself and put there.
Then you continued on with hearsay and your hearsay 'information' was
inflammatory, it was inciting, not to mention you lost any
credibility you ever thought you had, a long, long time ago. You are
a merchant of chaos, you have no firsthand knowledge of anything and
you spew hearsay and hate out of that bizarre, crooked, floppy mouth
of yours.
People
need to understand that the hearsay you hawk would never stand up in
a court of law.
Let's start with the 'tax' defying issue first. Isn't it true, Mark Potok, that practically half of the Administration does not pay taxes? Is it not true Mark Potok, that you act as Director of, and run an organization called the Southern Poverty Law Center aka SPLC aka SPLcenter, that is a TAX EXEMPT CORPORATION? How is it that you think you have the authority to bash anyone for not paying taxes to the government, when first off, virtually half the government doesn't, and secondly, your organization called the SPLC doesn't pay taxes EITHER. Would that 'fact' alone put you in the very category that you attempt to box others into ie. Sovereign citizens?
"Law”
defying? Perhaps you didn't get the memo Sir, but Jerry Kane had a
Drivers license. Jerry Kane had a proper Ohio License plate. Jerry
Kanes registration was valid until 06/12. "Law"defying...how,
exactly?
Oh,
I forgot. Sovereign citizens don't believe in Drivers Licenses,
License plates or registrations. So explain in great detail for all
of us to see please, exactly how Jerry Kane was a 'Sovereign
citizen'?
“sovereign
citizens” movement,
How
many times can someone cram the words 'Sovereign citizen' into just
one single Hatewatch article? Let's ask Mark Potok!
Wray wrote me a furious Furious? Furious how? Post the E-mail. Show how 'Furious' it was. Nobody will ever take your word again, Mark Potok. You better cite credible sources, facts, links and you better have yourself covered 12 ways to Sunday, henceforth, because you have no credibility any more, at all. Why leave out the part about how Wray sent the SPLC an email, reporting the name, address, city, state, zip and phone number of a vicious Hate group that had been attacking people for decades? And how the SPLC aka the Southern Poverty Law Center didn't act on the Hate group she reported? Or the reason why? It was because she reported the SPLC aka the Southern Poverty Law Center as a Hate group, to itself. Some 'Hatewatchers' you people are!
E-mail Probably next up on Mark Potoks list is E-mail terrorism? Because 'Paper terrorism' has lost its 'oh so scary overtones' because someone might get a 'paper cut'? The only scary part about E-mail terrorism would be the SPLC gets an electronic donation and it accidentally gets sent into the junk mail folder...How is donating monies to the SPLC and ADL going to stop the next wrongfully accused lone wolf trigger man? Have they EVER explained that to anybody while begging and scraping for donations? Let's ask them another question! To SPLC's Mark Potok and ADL's Nigut, "How can sending donations to your TAX EXEMPT organizations, possibly protect innocent victims of trigger happy law enforcement, considering the fact that you are now in bed with the most brutal racist Civil Rights violating Police Department in America?"
saying that I had “profiled” her You not only "profiled" her, you also profiled the Kanes! Are you claiming you didn't? Are you claiming you haven't continued ever since?
(not Kane or his 16-year-old son) and that this was a “Felony act.” It IS a "Felony act" to profile people. No President, no Federal Judge, no Police Chief, NO PUBLIC SERVANT PERIOD has the authority to profile people, put people on hit lists or order people killed. THEY ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS. It is expressly forbidden by the Constitution. Governments’ sole purpose is to maintain and protect individual rights! How is profiling people 'maintaining and protecting their rights'? It isn't. Anything other than that, is Unconstitutional! Unconstitutional acts are acts of Treason. Public SERVANTS do not have the right to do it. That means you most certainly don't have the right, being a TAX EXEMPT Corporation. Good lord, I feel like I'm trying to explain how a TV works to a dog. The Southern Poverty Law Centers' Mission statement is: To Educate the Educationally and Economically Deprived. Where does it say you can be a Hate group? Where does it say you can Profile people, Mark Potok? Where does it say you can incite hatred and victimize victims, HUH? Because I don't see where it allows you to do so in your Charter or Articles of Incorporation. Or in your mission statement. So where is your perceived authority? Produce it.
Moreover, she said, neither she nor the Kanes were so-called sovereign citizens Not only does your hate filled 'Letter' prove that she informed you that she and the Kanes were NOT sovereign citizens, you continued to label them as such. This shows that you willfully and maliciously continued Felony profiling and incited hatred, when you had full knowledge, from the source, that you were lying. Yet you persisted! Nobody will ever trust anything your Hate group called the SPLC, puts out, ever again.
Not only that, Mark Potok, you go on to completely contradict yourself from one sentence to the next. Was she not in fact saying you had profiled Kane AND his 16-year-old son when she said neither she nor the Kanes were so-called sovereign citizens?? What possible reason could you have to justify your attacking people so viciously? Can you not even stay consistent from one sentence to the next? Do you just wildly type out whatever you think will yield you the most TAX EXEMPT DONATIONS?
By the way, I wonder what people would think about the case you/SPLC took for the mother of the boy who was severely beaten or killed at a carnival-like affair. She received approximately $58,000 while you/SPLC got your percentage of the case, then raked in an additional $9,000,000.00 plus IN TAX EXEMPT DONATIONS! Did you share any of that with the mother of the boy? We are going to find out. We are on to you Mark Potok.
and that “a child could comprehend” Yes, a child could comprehend this, 'apparently', children are smarter than you.
that “there is no such thing as a sovereign citizen.” Note to self: Alert people to the fact that a sovereign is under God and a citizen is under the government. Big difference. Can't be both. We claim God to be our Master. We believe we know who your Master is.
She said I “better have excellent insurance” and threw in a few sophomoric insults for good measure. Yes, you better have excellent insurance, both personally and professionally. In fact, alert your insurance adjuster immediately that there will be a claim put against it. Consider this your Formal Notice of Intention to Sue.
In fact, the sovereign citizens movement is a well-established part of the American radical right. Radical right? I am issuing you an immediate CEASE & DESIST Sir. If you are caught profiling or labeling just one more AMERICAN, man or woman, we will wind up your gravy train TAX EXEMPT donation mill trough you parasite off of, in a sick effort to part Americans from their hard earned monies under the ridiculous auspices of stopping hate with hate. How dare you come into OUR country attempting to destroy it from within, not pay taxes, fearmonger and try to separate and box Americans into categories? What right do you have? No right at all. You trot out the same old tired playbook over and over. Problem. Reaction. ‘Solution’. It’s ridiculous and insulting to our intelligence.
Adherents typically believe that they are not bound by government laws Where is your proof of this? And what business is it of yours even if it is true? Are you the people police now? Are you claiming that Jerry Kane did in fact NOT have a Drivers license, a proper Ohio License plate and a valid registration on his vehicle? Where is that troll J.J. MacNabs proof that the Kanes had 'unusual license plates?" The same J.J. MacNab who wrote yet another hit piece on the Kanes, entitled "Sovereign citizen Kane." How long did it take her to come up with that catchy phrase? About 2 seconds? It was not surprising that the SPLC, on their www.splcenter.org site, was only too happy to print J.J. MacNabs regurgitated spew and full of lies article about the Kanes. J.J. MacNab barely got even a single fact right. It was surprising that J.J. MacNab didn't have Jerry Kane whispering the word 'Rosebud', as he was being tortured and wrongfully murdered. About J.J. MacNab: J.J. MacNab is a nationally known tax and insurance expert who has testified before the U.S. Congress and in other important venues. The author of numerous articles, she is currently at work on a book about the sovereign citizens movement. An expert? An expert of what? She can't even get the simple fact correct that Jerry Kane had a regular License plate which she describes as an 'unusual license plate' and she's writing a BOOK?
NOTICE TO J.J. MacNab
The
process of suing your derriere off is already in the works. You print
anything about the Kanes, the family or the widow, you will be
penniless until the day you die! THAT is a promise.
Hale
v. Henkel. 201 U.S. 43:”...we are of the opinion that there is a
clear distinction in this particular between an INDIVIDUAL and a
CORPORATION, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its
books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The
individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He
is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His
power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to
his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an
investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no
such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond
the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as
existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of
the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and
in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal
to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property
from arrest and seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes
nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their
rights. Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the
state. ...”
Your
Tax Exempt SPLC Corporation is a creature of the state. The people
entrusted some of their Sovereign power to the state, but only under
the agreement of abiding by the Constitution, to protect and maintain
the peoples Rights. No man or woman, as clearly shown in the above US
court case, owes you anything. OUR rights are such as existed by the
law of the land long (before) antecedent to the organization of the
state, and can only be taken from us by due process of law, AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION! No man or woman owes no such duty
to the state (or you/SPLC or the ADL), since he receives nothing
therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property.
The
state of Arkansas didn't even protect Jerry Kane or Joe Kanes right
to protection of their lives and property, as GUARANTEED! The Kanes
owed NO duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his
business, or to open his doors to an investigation!
We
stand upon our God given rights, affirmed by the Constitution. Your
Organization called the SPLC, as a 'creature of the state', cannot.
You have no right to refuse to submit YOUR books and papers for an
examination at the suit of the state. WE CAN! How DARE you attempt to
make people believe that they have to stoop to the level of a
corporate creature of the state, thereby attempting to make them
believe they have no rights???
What proof do you claim to have that states the Constitution is not the Supreme Law of the Land, Mark Potok? If a Judge says the Constitution is not the Supreme Law of the Land, that is an UNConstitutional statement, thereby making it not simply VOIDABLE, it is VOID!
Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425
An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protections, it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as if it had never been passed.
Boyd
v. US
The court is to protect against any constitutionally protected
liberty.
Marbury
v. Madison 5 U.S.(1 Cranch) 137 1803
Any
act in violation of the Constitution is null and void. (Meaning it's
not Voidable, it is VOID).
Murdock v. Penn. 319 U.S. No state shall convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and fee for it.
Shuttlesford v. Birmingham Alabama If the state does convert a secured liberty in to a privilege and issues a license and a fee for it, you can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity.
5th Amendment of the Constitution: Shall not be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
Is there any part of the Constitution which is the Supreme Law of the Land and/or US Supreme Court case decisions listed above, that you don't comprehend?
and are not liable for taxes. Like your own Tax Exempt SPLC? And what about the ADL? And virtually half of the Administration? Speaking of the Anti-Defamation League: The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 "to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all." “Secure justice and fair treatment to all?” All of whom? All jewish people? Because you certainly hadn't 'secured justice and fair treatment to the Kanes by bashing, attacking and profiling the innocent dead father and 16 year old boy, and bashed the widow for speaking out on their behalf, because nobody was left to speak for them, besides her? Are we speaking about the same Anti-Defamation League aka ADL that goes around Defaming everyone? Defaming everyone except jewish people? That deliberately bashes the lowly goyim, muslims and hindus? The ADL is yet another TAX EXEMPT 'creature of the state' that has traversed enormously outside of their stated purpose! Is this the same ADL aka Anti-Defamation League where Nigut said "The people need to realize that the government has ultimate control over their lives'? The government is comprised of Public SERVANTS, Sir. Who are the Public SERVANTS there to serve, if not the People? Let's put this in perspective on a slightly smaller scale. What if someone told you that "The maid you hired that comes into the house that you own, that you pay an exceptionally good wage to, to clean your house, has the ultimate control over your life?" Utterly preposterous. Has the world lost its collective mind? How dare you 'creatures of the state' go around profiling ANYONE and pointing fingers at those who don't pay taxes, when organizations called the SPLC aka Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL aka Anti-Defamation League are TAX EXEMPT CORPORATIONS that don't pay taxes! Who are either of you, or anybody else for that matter, to point fingers at any of the people?
Many subscribe to so-called “redemption” theories — the completely bogus idea Completely bogus idea according to who, you? The mouthpiece for the 'creature of the state' corporate Fiction clown who deliberately conceals and withholds FACTS? And has no business in the peoples' business?
that sovereign citizens Only Sovereign citizens? Really? Again with the sovereign citizens? What about YOUR Tax Exempt status? Is that a completely bogus idea or is it what is happening now and has been happening for years? How long have you been begging and scraping for donations and not paying any taxes in our country, and putting people on your stupid 'Hate lists' and ‘Hit lists’ that go shockingly outside of your stated purpose?
can escape their debts in many circumstances. Yes, we know about how you escape your tax debts with your Organizations' SPLC Tax Exempt status.
Jerry Kane spent the last two years giving seminars that hawked the idea that many people do not have to repay mortgage loans. First, what is the difference between the attorneys all over cable television 24/7 stating they can settle credit card debt or IRS debt for virtually nothing or pennies on the dollar? Or is that 'legit'? Second, Jerry Kane spoke on the Fraud of the banks, which is finally being reported on all over the media. Third, why do you think that judges have thrown out thousands of mortgage foreclosure cases out? Fourth: An Alabama judge in Horace v. Lasalle just ruled that the 'borrower' is actually the third party beneficiary to the Pooling and Servicing agreement. What does that tell you, genius?
And, according to The [Memphis] Commercial Appeal, Kane declared himself a sovereign man not bound by the government’s laws in a 12-page, April 8, 2003, document filed in an Ohio court. Nice 'attribute' to the Commercial Appeal, about Kane declared himself a sovereign man. And you knew different. Do you even had a slight clue, Sir, as to how responsible you will be held for the demonization and character assassination (after assassination) of Jerry Kane & Co? It should start to be sinking in. Soon. Very soon. Jerry Kane declared himself a National. And you're a (very bad) liar Mark Potok. He absolutely said in a 12-page, April 8, 2003, document that he IS bound by the government's laws. He said he is NOT bound or liable for victimless crimes. How can a crime be committed if there is no victim, or damaged property? A real crime, (not the fake quasi under color of law crime), means that someone or something is damaged and there's proof of damage. How can there be damage to someone or something is there is not a victim to claim damages, other than the understandable murder case? Enlighten us all with your wisdom for a change.
In her E-mail, in fact, Wray repeatedly referenced classic sovereign citizens language and ideas — including the notion that “common law” is the real law of the land Are you stating that the Constitution is NOT the Supreme law of the land? Are you claiming that the Constitution is VOID Mark Potok? How many times in the Constitution are the words 'Common Law' used? Quick, I'm timing you. Enlighten us all to precisely what, then, is the real Supreme law of the land.
and that people We claim to be part of the people
(sovereign citizens, that is) Says who, you?
can “copyright” their name. Who are you to say someone can't? Who are you to say anything about anybody, 'creature of the state'? Really Mark Potok, who do you think you are?
“Mark Potok,” she wrote, “has violated my common law copyright notice for use of my name and my Claim of Intent and Fee Schedule properly recorded and noticed is in effect, that requires any entity that uses my name without my express written permission must pay me a fee of $1,000,000.00. For each use.” Yes you did violate her notice and fee schedule! And your point is? Are you actually trying to claim you didn’t get it? YOU PRINTED NOTICE OF IT! Even more outlandish was you posted clear and full knowledge of a contract that clearly showed you agreed and stipulated to pay, if you used it. And then you used it! Where did you get express written permission? You didn't. You agreed, admitted and stipulated, by posting full knowledge of it, and then doing it, that you owe it. It's right there in your article. I can see people right now, reading this and shaking their heads at the sheer stupidity of what you did.
Do you know what a Public Notice is, Sir? Do you know what a Fee Schedule is? I'm sure you showed a Fee Schedule to that mother you/SPLC took the case for. The one where she received $58,000 AFTER you had already received YOUR percentage off the case and on top of that, you/SPLC received over $9,000,000.00 IN TAX FREE DONATIONS? Surely you know, right? Someone needs to get this Letter to her so she can file suit against you, and collect what is RIGHTfully hers, not yours.
Two days later, Yes, two days later. Also two months later. Also almost a year later, still the widow never gave up. Despite your constant attacks, viciousness and lies. Good for her!
Wray was at it again, Wray was at what again? Still making a futile attempt to set the record straight again, and again and again, despite your lying through your gums, not giving you carte blanche? How stupid of her. The nerve of that woman! How dare her not retreat into pained silence, or try to offer condolences to the killers of her family like you would. These are your own words which is public evidence! Why does it strike me as so very odd that there was something, something that you didn't want the widow to find out? Oops, too late! We found out. We got the autopsy reports proving the traffic stop and the officers’ unfortunate deaths were a strategic, surround hit with multiple shooters, from different automatic weapons used and different automatic weapons ROUNDS left at the scene of the crime! This clears the Kanes of all wrongdoing and proves they weren't at any traffic stop. Mark Potok completely discredited yet again, despite his best efforts yet again! Who would be dumb enough to attempt to trot you out again for anything ever again?
issuing a meandering We know, Mark Potok. You already stated in the first paragraph of this hate filled Letter, "Many people, seeing their immediate family members killed after allegedly murdering two police officers, might retreat into pained silence. Some might even find a way to express their condolences to the officers’ loved ones." How dare she try to give a decent explanation as to what she saw as wrong, so that people would understand! The date of this hate filled Letter called 'What's in a name? For Donna Lee Wray, millions?' By Mark Potok dated June 3, 2010, came out two weeks after the incident and STILL no dash cam shown yet. The sole faked dash cam video with no audio wouldn't be made, um, released for another 27 days. How DARE you bash someone whose family and pets were killed. How DARE you! Again, the nerve of that woman! You really hate women and Americans, don't you Mark Potok?
press release that accused police of “massacr[ing]” the Kanes, Are you stating there was not a circular firing stance of about 2 dozen cops, and there wasn't a lot of rounds fired at the Kanes vehicle? Is that what you're claiming? Are you claiming they weren't massacred? Hell, the minivan was even massacred. The cops shot the dog 8 times after it jumped out of the minivan. Are you claiming the police aren't the ones who did the massacre? Who carried out the massacre which included launching over 150+ rounds at the Kanes minivan? Are you claiming the Kanes are alive? What exactly is your claim, Sir?
“obliterat[ing] evidence,” Are you claiming that the police didn't reach in the minivan and take out what looked like a rifle shape? Is that what you're claiming? Are you claiming that the police didn't drag the bodies out of the minivan? Is that what you're claiming Mark Potok?
and engaging in a “COVERUP.” Good, that shows she was not a quitter despite your and other media ilk 'best efforts' to violate the dead and bash and attack a widow who had lost her family and pets to killer cops, and she was right all along!!
The allegation that the Kanes were extremists is “ridiculous,” and they were not antigovernment, she said. That's right. YOUR allegations of the Kanes as extremists were ridiculous and hateful. Yet you persisted and refused to stop the lies and ad hominem attacks on innocent dead people and the one left standing up for them, despite your best efforts. You were ineffective Mark Potok. And that's right. YOUR allegation that the Kanes were anti-government was also ridiculous and hateful. Yet again, you persisted and refused to stop the lies and ad hominem attacks on innocent dead people and the one left standing up for them, despite your best efforts. You were again ineffective Mark Potok. Your continuing the attacks, libel and slander after you were clearly informed otherwise, and you even printed the acknowledgement of receipt of being given Notice within your own Hatewatch hit piece. This is clear evidence of a systematic attack after prior Notice and prior knowledge.
“They were all for government,” Wray wrote. “Real Government. Right. The Kanes were anti-corrupt government.
I have evidence and proof that the West Memphis Police Department is a private company … clearly a private for profit business.” It sure is. Anyone can go look at the prestigious Dunn and Bradstreet sister site at www.Manta.com, type in any supposed government or corporate entity and can see for themselves that they are all completely privatized. Like the SPLC. People should type that in, and see what that yields. Furthermore, West Memphis Police Department is simply an Administrative arm of the executive branch. Administrators. Do you know what an 'Administrator' is, Mark Potok?
“Jerry,” his common-law widow Contradicted yourself again here. At least this time, you got it right. In the past tense. Well, you know what they say. Even a broken watch is actually correct, twice a day.
added, “was right all along.” Yes, he sure was right all along.
Then,
after describing reporters as “nasty vultures,” she got back to
the cash.
She
got back to the cash? Do you know what projection and transference
is, Mark Potok? You just described your/SPLC Modus Operandi to a T.
Bash, then beg and scrape for Tax Exempt donations. Fearmonger, then
get back to the Tax Exempt cash.
“I
am giving Public notice right now that [two reporters and their
networks] are henceforth banned and do not have my consent to print
anything about me or my family. Period. Unless they agree to pay
$5,000,000 for each article printed.”
Why
did you cut off what was said in the next sentences Mark Potok? Is
what the widow said in the very next sentences within the same
paragraph not fit in with you stating 'She was back to the cash?'
WHY? WHY did you deliberately, willfully and maliciously cut it off
the BULK of the remainder of the paragraph where she said "This
is not about money. I don't want the money. I just want it to be so
out of their monetary range that it is impossible for them to print
anything else. All other Networks and/or Reporters who report
responsibly have my consent and permission to do so."
She clearly and specifically stated: All other Networks and/or Reporters who report responsibly have my consent and permission to do so. Did you print responsibly Mark Potok? Did you? No, you didn't. Again, blatantly tromping on peoples' rights.
Here is the full paragraph of what was said, verbatim [UNedited/UNmolested by Mark Potok]:
I am giving Public notice right now that if Rodney Thrash or Lauren Lee or their Networks or any principal or agent thereof that they work for or exchange 'News' story with are henceforth banned and do not have my consent to print anything about me or my family. Period. Unless they agree to pay $5,000,000 for each article printed. This is not about money. I don't want the money. I just want it to be so out of their monetary range that it is impossible for them to print anything else. All others Networks and/or Reporters who report responsibly have my consent and permission to do so.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dSHl3C9kgY
Zionist thugs beating up Jewish Rabbis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBNMDjj5LKc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yp06DXZ90o
******************************************************
www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com
*****************************************************
A CALL TO THE CLANS
As
descendant of Duncan Ban MacIntyre, (per ardua, through adversity),
Bruce, Stuart, I call upon and invoke a stirring and gathering of the
ancient spirits of our Irish/Scot ancestors, Septs, bloodlines and
all descendants of the Clans: MacIntyres, MacDonalds, Maguires,
McGuires, Chattans, Pattersons, Wrights, Cartwrights, MacTears,
Wainwrights, Blackwoods, Boatwrights, Carpenters, Menzies, Tyres,
Greens, MacGregors, Stookeys, Davis, MacFarlanes, Stuckeys, Smiths,
Campbells, Fortners, Fergusons, Jones, Linds, Wrays, Coshems,
Morgans, Rivers, Hames, MacDonells, Shepherds, Mills, MacRights,
McCoiseams, Teers, MacKintyres, MacCoshams, Davids, Whites, Millers,
Simms, Kanes, O'Kanes, and many, many others, too many to list here,
you know who you are, and all others who hate brutal unimaginable
injustices: I send out a plea to see and read this message at
www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com
then send this message far and wide. Send the web site
www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com
far and wide! People, Look what they did to our people, to our
family. SEE WHAT THEY DID. They murdered my beloved family, my husband Jerry and my 16 year old stepson Joe, who
would have taken the shirts off their backs and given to anyone in
need. And did so, many times. They spent many days helping people for
nothing, who had nothing, for no compensation. They also killed our 2 dogs. Little Missy killed by a Game & Fish officer of all things when he rammed our minivan. One of Little Joe's last acts was to try to save his only surviving dog, that was still alive, Olie (Little Missy's son) and he forced Olie to jump out of the center drivers side window. Joe was unarmed and helping Olie escape and Joe was shot repeatedly through the center drivers side window. Olie was shot 8 times after he escaped the minivan. The perpetrators who
took an Oath, and whose job it was to give due process, took it upon
themselves to deny due process and outright murdered my family. When
it was found that the perpetrators knew they had murdered innocents,
they conspired to cover it up. They almost succeeded. And almost
succeeded in killing me. Please never forget that Jerry Kane and Joe
Kane were falsely accused of horrible crimes. The perpetrators
reverse engineered and orchestrated false evidence after the fact, to
make it appear that my family had committed crimes when my family was
in fact, themselves, the victims of the most unspeakable horrible
crimes. By the very ones who swore an Oath to protect them. And when
it was known immediately known by the perps that it was not my family
who committed those crimes, instead of the perpetrators coming
forward, they then conspired further to deceive, lie and brought
forth faked evidence put into the public as genuine, to cover up
their unspeakable Homicides. For almost a year they did this, with
help, in effort to save their own jobs, avoid prison sentences with
no regard for others. One of the conspiring perpetrators that denied
due process publicly threatened to kill me for questioning their
official story, for trying to bring forth Discovery and due process
into the matter. Please pray for Jerry Kane and Joe Kane. Please know
and be proud of the fact that they were wise, good, very loving and
kind people. Their souls are not at rest and in turmoil and are
crying out for the criminal perpetrators to be brought to justice!
Please send love and healing prayers. Please help. Much love to all,
and thank you.
P.S. IF my call comes too late due to the very best and brightest of us having been systematically killed off for over one thousand years, being carefully conditioned to believe most everything we are told, and IF we have been devolved to where we cannot make right what is horribly wrong. Then I say to the handful of people who run the world: Blow it up. Into a huge fireball. We had our chance and allowed these Homicidal parasites free reign. Good men did nothing to stop them. Give the roaches or mice a chance to evolve. I truly believe they deserve it. I highly doubt they would lie, cheat, steal, attack, torture, wrongfully kill their own kind, conspire cover ups, put out falsified 'evidence' into the public presented as genuine, to keep their jobs, avoid prison. Or smear, lie, spread blind unadulterated hate in order to receive TAX EXEMPT DONATIONS!
******************************************************
www.JusticeforJerryandJoeKane.com ******************************************************
FLAT OUT LIES AND COMPLETE CONTRADICTIONS
According to the ASP Crime Lab Autopsy reports, Jerry and Joe Kanes Manner of death: Homicides.
Sole 'Eyewitness' Vincent Brown stated in his recorded 911 call 'These guys just shot a cop.'
The dash cam shows a morbidly obese man, alleged to be Jerry Kane, clearly never with a weapon.
*Which evidence is true? Both are in complete conflict, but that doesn't mean that either one must be true.* There may be other possibilities. Both the 911 call AND the dash cam may be fake.
Sole 'Eyewitness' Vincent Brown stated in his 911 call that “They're all with automatic weapons.”
This does not match the dash cam with no audio released 41 days after the incident, it shows a morbidly obese man alleged to be Jerry Kane, never with a weapon. The boy shown in the video was not Joe Kane.
*Which evidence is true? Both are in complete conflict, but that doesn't mean that either one must be true.* There may be other possibilities. Both the 911 call AND the dash cam may be fake.
On Chief Paudert May 26, 2010, in The Commercial Appeal video interview he said his officers Bill and Brandon had THEM out and they were talking to them, Brandon on one side, Bill on the other, talking to THEM, when the guy in the back started shooting.” The dash cam never shows both of the Kanes out of the vehicle at the same time being talked to by Bill and Brandon. This describes a completely different scene with three (3) or more individuals, having nothing to do with the Kanes.
*Chief Paudert could be lying or the dash cam could be faked.* There may be other possibilities. The Chief could be lying AND the dash cam could be fake.
The Sole eyewitness states that the killers took the license plates off at the traffic stop.
The dash cam shows the license plates were never taken off at the traffic stop.
*The Sole eyewitness could be lying or the dash cam is faked.* There may be other possibilities. The eyewitness could be lying AND the dash cam could be fake.
ASP Crime Lab Autopsy report states that Jerry Kane Jr. had a slightly obese abdomen.
41 days later a dash cam appears, displaying a man with a morbidly obese abdomen who is not Jerry Kane Jr.
*Either the ASP Crime Laboratory Autopsy report Coroner is lying or the dash cam is faked* We have said all along that the morbidly obese gutted man portrayed on the dash cam was NOT Jerry Kane!
In recorded 911 call, two (2) 911 operators ask the Sole eyewitness if the killers car had Ohio tags, he said “no”.
911 put out an APB that the killers had Ohio tags despite the Sole eyewitness clearly said “no”, to Ohio tags.
In the December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article, Wren stated that 'The Kanes marched toward them (Wren and Busby) in the Walmart parking lot.' Marched is a term designed to give a military impression to imply justification of self defense on the part of the participants. Where is the evidence of "marching?"
Assorted videos shows the Kanes didn't marched anywhere. Does a video show marching? If so, produce it!
*Wren could be lying or the Helicopter video or other videos could be doctored.* There may be other possibilities. Wren could be lying AND the videos could be doctored.
The December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article Wren stated “As the suspects marched toward the officers, he heard one of them reload. The clip slapped into the gun, metal on metal.”
The Kanes had one revolver that held 5 rounds, revolvers obviously don’t have a ‘clip to slap in.’
The Kanes had one AK-47 that didn't have a clip, it had a magazine that couldn't “slap into the gun, metal on metal”! What Wren heard was a fellow officer REloading because it was impossible for the Kanes to have done it! And why would an officer be REloading unless he had already UNloaded and shot his weapon out of bullets?
*Either Wren is lying or FBI custodian of the property is lying* There may be other possibilities. Wren could be lying AND the videos could be doctored.
The December 26, 2010 Commercial Appeal article Wren stated 'Suddenly a swarm of officers shouted to Wren and Busby: "Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground!" Wren and Busby, both blood-soaked, watched as fellow officers fired over their heads, pushing the suspects back in the van.
Busby and Wren were shot by officers
located around the scene, not by the Kanes. When Busby and Wren were
ordered to Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground it was only
AFTER Busby and Wren got down that fellow officers were, then,
'Firing over their heads.' Prior to Busby and Wren told to Stay
down! Stay down! Get down on the ground! Busby and Wren were DIRECTLY
in fellow officers’ line of fire around the Kanes van being shot
and Busby and Wren were shot repeatedly by friendly fire. This is WHY
they were screamed at to Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the
ground! Everyone saw the crazy circular cross firing stance of the
officers shortly thereafter. Where are all the Ballistic reports? Oh
that's right, the Prosecutor announced 41 days after the incident
that they weren't going to do ballistics. We were stunned that they
hadn't done ballistics ALREADY within the forty one day interim
waiting period for the dash cam to come out. Prosecutor Mike Walden
said they didn't NEED to do ballistics.... Why
are the reports not generated? Why isn't it needed?
We are demanding all powder, paraffin testings and ballistics be done immediately!
But…Wren stated 'Suddenly a swarm of officers shouted to Wren and Busby: "Stay down! Stay down! Get down on the ground!", there is not one officer to be seen other than Wren and Busby in any direction of the scene from the aerial view of the helicopter video! And considering there was an alleged Helicopter overhead, how could Wren hear anything from anybody? *Wren could be lying or the helicopter video could be doctored.* There may be other possibilities. The eyewitness could be lying AND the videos can be fabricated.
We never see the 'suspects' out of the van 'marching' in order to make it possible to be 'pushed back in the van.'
*Wren could be lying or the Helicopter video could doctored* There may be other possibilities. Wren could be lying AND the videos can be a fabricated.
Chief Paudert said Court was held in the parking lot that day stating that if the Kanes had put down their weapons they'd be alive today and in jail. This is a boldfaced lie. The Kanes would never have used weapons unless they tried to surrender and were shot first, as indicative of the defensive wounds on Jerry Kanes left palm and the Kanes would not be in jail. The Kanes would have cleared any wrongdoing surely and swiftly. These 'law enforcement officers' were rogue vigilantes that killed an innocent family.
According to the ASP Crime Laboratory autopsy report, the real Jerry Kane with the slightly obese abdomen, (not that obese actor that looked 12 months pregnant with breasts) had been shot below his thumb through the palm of his left hand. Jerry Kane, Jr. palm had to be facing toward Sheriff Busby and Wren in a defensive, hands up surrender mode, when Wren or other officer/s shot him. There were no calls for surrender from Busby and Wren. After Jerry Kane, Jr., held his hands up in a surrender mode, he was shot! Put down what weapons? Are hands held up in surrender mode palms forward, now considered weapons? Jerry Kane, Jr. started to back his minivan away from the altercation, most likely horrified and very confused as to why his minivan had been cut off in the Walmart parking lot by an unmarked vehicle cutting off his minivan in the front, the same actions carjackers use. Wondering why he was shot to begin with, with hands up, then the 'Hero' wildlife officer slammed his truck into the Kanes minivan then proudly recited how he shot 30 rounds down at them. We have forensically analyzed the videos frame by frame and we also used FLIR technology. No shots came from the Kanes minivan. However, many shots and shotgun loads were seen going into the Kanes van. The Kanes were slaughtered with extreme prejudice because it was falsely believed they had killed Paudert and Evans at a prior stop. The Kanes had done nothing wrong to warrant their vehicle being rammed, father and minor son and 2 beloved family pets riddled with bullets. Little Missy was killed when the 'Hero' wildlife officer rammed the minivan. Olie our dog was shot 8 times AFTER he jumped out of the minivan trying to run to a safe area.
***************************************************************************************************************

Share

http://www.todaysthv.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=107504&catid=2
Then,
Sergeant Brandon Paudert pulls up for backup. Within 2-minutes,
Paudert runs as he hears gun
fire. You can clearly see
the shooter is the son, Joe Kane holding an AK-47. After about a
minute, father and
son get in the car and Joe shoots four more rounds as they drive off.
***Paudert runs when he hears gun fire? How would the news media or anybody know that? We were told there wasn't any audio! So this is like Lie #45. Produce the audios! Never mind. When we said to produce the dash cam and audios, you thought we really meant produce them. As is a production.







































































LEGEND:
BKOP: 911 BACKGROUND OPERATOR
FEDEX 'ONLY EYWITNESS' DRIVER VINCENT BROWN
FEMALE COMPANION WITH VINCENT BROWN
OP1 911 OPERATOR 1
OP2 911 OPERATOR 2
OP3 911 OPERATOR 3
FEDEX: Hello
OP1: 9 -1- 1 , Where’s your emergency?
8
sec FEDEX: Exit 2-75 on 40. These guys just shot a
police officer. Right on the EXIT. (Notice he says guys. Later he says it was a boy that came out of 'nowhere'.
OP1: You say ..
14 sec FEDEX TRUCKDRIVER 'EYEWITNESS' : He's laying in the street (This had to be Paudert) however in the Official police report Brown says the boy went after Evans FIRST and that Paudert was going to help him but ran around his car...complete contradiction by the same 'Witness'.OP1: You say an officer has just been shot on ah, at 2-70 what?
FEDEX: 2-7, Exit 2-75 on 40OP1: 2-75 on 40? 2-75 on 40?
OP1: Wait a minute.
FEDEX: Yeah
OP1: Where are you?
FEDEX: I’m, I’m, at the EXIT. They’re right in front of me about, a hundred feet.
OP1: Okay. Where are they?
32 sec FEDEX Right pass the .. they’re leaving in a white Caravan ( Ok so the white Caravan is history now right? So who shot Evans? )
BKOP: 9-1-1
FEDEX: quaravan (sic) (It sounds like they've started up a reel to reel tape)
OP1: Okay. Stay on the line then.
OP1: Okay, It’s a white what?
FEDEX: It’s a white caravan. A white Dodge Caravan
OP2: WHITE DODGE CARAVAN?
OP2: OFFICER SHOT WHERE?
OP1: 2-sevent-
FEDEX: Exit 2-75, mile ma--, Exit 2-75 on 40. Right past the weigh station.
OP1: Right past the weigh station. OK.
55 s FEDEX: P L E A S E hurry. He’s standing right in front of me. ( Who is standing right in front of him ie Vincent Brown? He said at 32 seconds that the white Caravan was leaving! )
1m BKOP: Dispatch 2-0-1, available units. Eastbound or westbound? 2-75. 2-75 westbound. We have someone 9-1-1. Couple of officers shot. 2-75 westbound trying to get further. Officers shot. Officers shot. 2-75 westbound. (Wait a minute, there's only been ONE officer reported shot at this point, why say 2 Officers shot? )....
1m7s FEDEX: OH MY GOD! OH SH*T! (Allegedly screaming because FEDEX driver now sees Paudert shot but he already said the cop (Paudert) was laying in the street at 14 seconds into this 911 call ) !!
BKOP: 2-89 please lead forward
FEDEX: OH MY GOD!
BKOP: 2-89 be advised 2-76
OP3: What’s u(p)? Where is this?
FEMALE: We gotta move away from
UNKNOWN: Oh my God.
BKOP: We’re getting
FEDEX: Please, hello?
BKOP: 2-75 westbound officer downtown.
BKOP: Up 2-74
OP2: Are you there?
FEDEX: Y E S ! D*MN!
OP2: Okay. Okay Whadda you see sir?
1m36s FEDEX: His brains, he’s dead. His brains is on …(Again, he already said the cop was laying in the road at 14 seconds, Paudert is the only one who took a head shot and again, Paudert is the only one laying in the road, who is this that Vincent Brown is referring to?? )
OP2: Is it an officer?
FEDEX:
Y
E S ! YES!
FEDEX: It’s a Tahoe and it’s a West Memphis Police Officer. Two white men, one fat. TWO COPS ARE DEAD! The other one’s in the ditch! They’re both dead ma’am. In this long statement the 'Only Eyewitness' states that it's 'Two white men, one fat'. We can hear several editings and unintellagible utterances covered up.
BKOP: 2-77 westbound
FEDEX: It’s right past the weigh station. Right past the weigh station. Headed east.
MALE OP: HEADED EAST? THINK IT’S HEADED EAST?
FEDEX: Yeah. Just past the weigh station, Exit 2-75.
MALE OP: Alright. Who’s headed east? The suspect or the victim?
FEDEX: Th-, they just, th- wh-, they killed both cops. They shot one and he fell in the ditch. The other ran behind the car and they shot him in the head.
MALE OP: Okay. Where’s the suspect now? (Suspect?)
FEDEX: They just left in a white Caravan. They just went right up the exit. (Right, they left at 32 seconds into the 911 call )
MALE OP: Exit off where?
FEDEX OP: Um. Just off EXIT 2-75. They went right up the road and I didn’t see them ….
OP3: Were they eastbound?
FEDEX: … after they went to the stop sign.
FEDEX: Huh?
OP3: Were the suspects eastbound?
FEDEX: It looks like they were eastbound. They went to the stop sign and I didn’t see them any more.
OP2: Suspect gonna be in a white Caravan. Eastbound last seen 2-75 mile marker.
MALE OP: Is that the suspects?
BKGND: Yes
OP3: Check the suspect in a white Caravan. Eastbound on 40. A white Caravan standby for instructions.
FEDEX: (unintilleg) just killed these cops. In a white Caravan. They just killed them. I called 9-1-1. (Why would he tell 911 he's calling 911?)
OP3 Ohio tags? (Why would they ask about Ohio tags since this is the first report of Officer down from an eyewitness??)
OP2 Are these Ohio Tags? (Again, why ask about Ohio tags??)
3m29s FEDEX: Nah, nah, they took them off (THEY TOOK THEM OFF!) Why then does the dash cam video showing the tag on the back of the vehicle as it's pulling away?)
OP3: What’s the tag number, honey? (Honey?)
FEDEX DRIVER 'EYEWITNESS': (unintellig) I streaming. (Apple I-pod or youstream(ing)?)
FEDEX TRUCKDRIVER 'EYEWITNESS': On screen baby (He directed his female passenger to give tag number)
FEMALE RIDING WITH VINCENT BROWN: RP 777 531, RP 777 531
Let's stop right here. RP 777531 was Jerry Kane's expired DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER, not his tag number. Jerry Kane's tag number is EDE 8396, as clearly shown on the fake dashcam and here. (Remember, the cops had the tags for 41 days to do reenactments til the cows came home). It is not possible for the FEMALE RIDING WITH VINCENT BROWN to know what Jerry Kanes expired Drivers License number was, any more than she would know what YOUR expired Drivers License number was! Furthermore, IF there had been a traffic stop, 911 would have already had the Kane's License Plate number. They didn't. Even further, they would not have put out an expired Drivers License number as an Ohio Tag number! But they did....
****** OP3: Gonna be OHIO, Romeo Papa 77753 OHIO tag White Caravan******
Putting out an expired Drivers License number from one who would have zero idea what it was, a female passenger of a Fedex truck driver who would have no knowledge whatsoever of Jerry Kane's expired Drivers license number yet giving it out as his tag number, says it all right there. They were obviously reading the wrong part of the script for the reenactment. Think about this, how would you know what anybody's Expired Drivers License number was? This fact alone shows the obvious Cover up!
But let's continue...
4m1s FEDEX: There’s a white COBRA unmarked. (How would this Fedex Truck driver know this unmarked Tahoe was a WHITE COBRA MEANING IT'S A SWAT VEHICLE, UNLESS HE KNEW WHAT IT WAS IN ADVANCE?)
OP3: Car number 2-3-2 and a unmarked white car?
FEDEX: And it’s an unmarked white car. (What? No mention of white COBRA/SWAT unmarked vehicle again?)
FEDEX (unintellig) … automatic weapon
FEDEX:
The the guy that in the Caravan. That the the the guys in the Caravan.
OP3: Yeah.
FEDEX: They’re all with automatic weapons. (Remember, the Official police report says that Joe Kane was the sole shooter. Jerry Kane had no weapon on him during the alleged traffic stop). This is obviously not the Kane's ***All with automatic weapons***).
OP3: Where are you at now?
4m24s FEDEX: I’m sta-, current- standing right over the cop. On Exit 2-75 (Then why didn't we hear the semi engine sound lower and lower, why can't we hear the noise from the vehicles on the Interstate? Why couldn't we hear the semi engine get louder and louder when he went back to the semi? Remember, the police report said his semi engine was on therefore he couldn't hear any gunshots. WHY would this Fedex driver go stand over a cop? How stupid do they think people are?
OP3: What car are you in?
4m35s FEDEX: I’m in a FEDEX truck. You can’t miss it. It’s, it’s huge. Tell the cop to come forward. He’s coming. It’s … (Why can't we hear the sirens???)
OP3: Give him this information. But you’re in a silica truck?
4m51s FEDEX: I’ve come back to the FEDEX truck. (in 27 seconds he's walked 33 1/3 yards?)
OP3: FedEX truck? 2-75, are you, pull over please … and stay there. (He's told them he was standing right over the cop, he told them he's been standing there, why tell him to 'Pull over'?)
FEDEX: Okay.
4m55s OP3: Pull over and stay there. Do not, do not move. (Why are they telling him to pull over??)
5m0s OP3: Let me get some officers there because you saw what happened, right? (Wait a minute, didn't the Fedex driver say 25 seconds earlier to tell the cop to come forward? Again, why don't we hear the sirens???)
FEDEX: Yes sir.
OP3: Call the state. I couldn’t get a hold of state.
BKGND: State, state.
5m12s OP3: You stay there sir. I’m gonna let you go. Stay there. (Why haven't they waited until the cops get there? Isn't that normal procedure and policy, particularly when you have a witness to 2 cop killings????)
Remember, when chief paudert did his interview with commercial appeal on May 25th, 2010 5 days after the killings, he never mentioned there was an eyewitness. Why? Because there wasn't one at that point. They had to create one. 5 days after the killings, IF there had been an eyewitness, chief paudert would have been screaming they had an Eyewitness from the rafters during his May 25th interview with commercial appeal. He kept making statements such as "The information I got was and I don't know how they know this but...." and many other statements along those lines. Furthermore, since 'after the fact' they claim there was only 'One Eyewitness', the Fedex Truck driver named Vincent Brown, why wasn't his unknown woman companion named as an eyewitness too? She's the one who read the script wrong giving out Jerry Kane's EXPIRED DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER AS HIS TAG NUMBER. But why didn't the chief say there was as Eyewitness? Because there wasn't one. Because neither of them were there! None of this makes any sense. Because it's all lies.The 911 call was clearly REVERSE ENGINEERED, after the FACT!
The Fedex drivers (Vincent Brown) is the police star witness and only eyewitness to the alleged shootings. Browns 911 call account is completely in conflict with his police report testimony. Neither of the Fedex drivers testimony in verbal (911 call) or written (police report) sync up with the dash cam video.
In Browns 911 call at 8 seconds he states they've just shot a police officer, at 14 seconds he says he's laying in the road. That had to be Sgt. Paudert as he was the only one found laying in the road. At 33 seconds Brown states They're leaving in a white Caravan. Then at 1 minute 7 seconds into the 911 call Brown screams (This would purportedly be due to seeing the other officer shot that was found in the ditch). But Brown screams about brains. Again, the only person or officer who took a head shot was the officer found laying in the road.
In the police report Browns story incredibly changes. Brown states that the boy comes out of nowhere and the boy he goes after Evans FIRST (officer Evans was the officer found in the ditch). The police report states that “Paudert was going to help Evans in the ditch but then (Paudert) ran around his patrol car where the boy timed it perfectly and shot him.” How could Paudert have been of any help to anyone, didn't Brown state in his 911 call at 8 seconds that they've killed a police officer and at 14 seconds he says he's laying in the road?
Realize that these 2 wildly different stories are from the police own same star witness! Which account are they going to use? Unfortunately for them, neither one of the 911 or police report accounts from their STAR WITNESS syncs up with the dash cam video they put out. I've never seen 3 of the most important pieces of evidence each ALL be in direct conflict with each of the other 2.
On the Paudert and Evans memorial pages it stated: They had the vehicle occupants exit the vehicle. Both men were armed with AK-47's. It went on to state that both officers were killed with AK-47's. We noticed that Evans memorial page had been changed to reflect they were killed by a long rifle and a handgun. We reminded them that by changing their story to a long rifle and a handgun that it was now in total conflict with what their star eyewitness Vincent Brown said. They changed it back to the officers were killed by AK-47's! Altering evidence, changing evidence, altering it back.
CONCLUSION: Dash cam video, 911 call from the star witness and written police report recounting the star witness eyewitness account, these 3 main pieces of evidence, not to mention the contradictory ever changing memorial pages, due to the fact that each main piece is in direct conflict with each of the other two main pieces of evidence, the only sane conclusion anyone can conclude from this debacle is: Only one of the above can even possibly be true. Or all are untrue because nothing coincides with any of the other pieces of evidence.
I find it amusing that the same man who claims that Adask is “obviously…crazy” also states that he would love for someone who considers themselves one of “Sovereign Citizens” to come attack him with weapons–that he would enjoy it.